de-duplication

“side-effects of cross-contextual de-duplication” de-duplication is sufficient to account for: Lateral thinking Re-contextualisation Generalisation Contextually, objectively, similar entry-point to common constituent Metaphor Contextually, objectively, dissimilar entry-point to common constituent Lateral, general, metaphorical problem-solving “interpretive contexts evolve to address a fundamental problem with abstract information (map): minimal-viable distinction” As map complexity (and lifecycle) evolves 1, and interpretation occurs across multiple interpretive contexts simultaneously, de-duplication also occurs across distinct interpretive contexts....

notes #tbc pre-cognition: Biology, senses, and cognition, evolved Senses evolved to detect patterns (relative arrangement) of stimuli by physical groupings of sensory receptors Patterns become persistable and composable Persisted composable patterns allow objective recognition of previously identified external phenomena By stitching together smaller patterns into larger arrangements (terrain, objects, etc), persisted composable patterns become larger than physical groupings of sensory receptors From this point, recognition is based upon matching sensory grouping to partial patterns of persisted representation Partial pattern matching allows Small physical groupings to match larger persisted representational compositions Establish objective sameness (to relate present location to known locations) De-duplicate representational arrangements (or parts thereof) Recognising partially obscured scenes, across different {moments; days; conditions; etc} And minimises resource requirements and latency ....

structured query language (SQL) - Wikipedia “note: normalised and de-normalised data have different meanings to structured relational data (SQL) than general scientific usage, but are handy concepts consider: normalised “rationalised: collapsed to minimal, relational graph” de-normalised “plurally enumerated: enumeration of all of the paths through the graph” Simplifying: normalised data is contextually de-duplicated; de-normalised data “double counts”

minimal-viability: “prefer the simplest explanation, but for territory” interpretation “the basis of cognition is interpretation” Biology, senses, and cognition, evolved. “we distinguish phenomena to survive – to distinguish, we must detect difference” Senses evolved to detect patterns (relative arrangement) of stimuli; patterns become persistable, then recognisable. Persisted, recognisable patterns help identify external phenomena, to improve the circumstances of survival. Mis-identification of external circumstances often worsen the circumstances of survival. “foundations of cognition include ‘distinguishing well’”...

minimal-viability: “prefer the simplest explanation, but for territory” evolution Biology, senses, and cognition, evolved. “we distinguish phenomena to survive – to distinguish, we must detect difference” Senses evolved to detect patterns (relative arrangement) of stimuli; patterns become persistable, then recognisable. Persisted, recognisable patterns help identify external phenomena, to improve the circumstances of survival. Mis-identification of external circumstances often worsen the circumstances of survival. “foundations of cognition include ‘distinguishing well’” discernment Consider that discernment is optimised by:...

De-duplication refers to a pattern of behaviour which evolved to address plural enumeration, a problem innate to map. “plural enumeration refers to an inherent side-effect of persisted interpreted representation – many maps can refer to the same territory – and without reconciliation, persisted “plurally enumerated” representations are operationally untenable” “consider the difference between a log file, and a database (see: on persisted representation)” De-duplication conditionally validates, corrects, consolidates, and optimises, plurally enumerated persisted representations – across all scopes of map (see: map lifecycle)...